Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• 95% of the scars were classified as excellent or very good, Grade 0 or 1 in longer follow-up. • Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking and history of hypertrophic scars did not show any significant differences. • The cosmetic quality of scar improves with postoperative length of time. To evaluate the quality of the thyroidectomy scars over a long period of time. Over a period of two years the quality of the thyroidectomy scars among 283 consecutive patients was registered during their follow-up for malignancies. On a scale of 0 (excellent) to 3 (bad) thyroidectomy scars were classified according to the time after surgery. After 5 years or more 95% of the scars were classified as excellent or very good; 55% of them were excellent, which indicates that the scar was virtually invisible at a distance of 1.5 meters. Only 5% of the cases had a regular or bad scar after 5-years or more, and only one patient (0.5%) had a bad scar. The scars remaining after thyroid surgery had an improved appearance with time, and the vast majority of patients had an excellent or very good scar after a period of five years or more. Level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: