ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationNEXTEfficient Diastereoselective Syntheses of Chiral Macrocycles via Zirconocene Coupling. Synthetic Control of Size and GeometryLaurel L. Schafer and T. Don TilleyView Author Information Center for New Directions in Organic Synthesis Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley and The Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11, 2683–2684Publication Date (Web):February 21, 2001Publication History Received4 January 2001Published online21 February 2001Published inissue 1 March 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja015509ohttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja015509orapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1175Altmetric-Citations55LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Macrocycles,Materials,Mathematical methods,Sandwich compounds,Stereoselectivity Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schafer et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: