BACKGROUND: The potential harmful effects of cancer treatments on reproductive function have now been clearly recognized. Exposure to chemotherapy is considered a risk factor for premature ovarian failure and causes infertility. This study investigated the prophylactic effects of gallic acid (GA) against cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced ovarian damage in rats. METHODS: Thirty-two adult female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned into four groups (control, CP, GA, and CP + GA). No procedure was applied to the control group. The CP group received 150 mg/kg CP via the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route on day 7 of the experiment. The GA group received 20 mg/kg GA daily for seven days from day 1 of the experiment via oral gavage. The CP + GA received 20 mg/kg GA daily for seven days from day 1 of the experiment via oral gavage and 150 mg/kg i.p. CA on day 7 of the experiment. All rats were sacrificed on day 8. Sections taken from the ovaries were stained using hematoxylin-eosin, Masson's trichrome, Periodic Acid-Schiff, and the TUNEL method. Histopathological examination of ovarian tissues and follicle counting were performed. Glutathione peroxidase (GPX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), tissue anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), and serum AMH levels were examined during biochemical investigation. RESULTS: Follicular cell degeneration increased significantly in the CP group compared to the control and GA groups (p < 0.001 for both). Follicular cell degeneration in the CP + GA group was significantly lower than in the CP group (p = 0.003), but higher than in the control and GA groups (p = 0.005, p = 0.015 and p = 0.029, respectively). The GA and control groups exhibited similar morphologies. The apoptotic index was higher in the CP group than in the control and CP + GA groups (p = 0.032 and p = 0.032, respectively). Primordial follıcle cell numbers decreased significantly in the CP group compared to the control and CP + GA groups (p = 0.015 and p = 0.029, respectively). Unilaminar primary follicle cell numbers were lower and atretic cell numbers were higher in the CP group than in the control and GA groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively). The numbers of unilaminar primary follicles were lower in the CP + GA group than in the control group (p = 0.009), while atretic follicle numbers were higher than in the control and GA groups (p < 0.001 for both). Atretic follicle numbers were also higher in the CP + GA group than in the control and GA (p = 0.009 and p = 0.008, respectively). MDA levels were higher in the CP than in the control and GA groups (p = 0,003 and p = 0.001, respectively). MDA levels in the CP + GA decreased compared to the CP group (p = 0.002). SOD activity decreased in the CP group compared to the control, CP + GA, and GA groups (p = 0.003, p = 0.006 and p = 0.038, respectively). Tissue CAT activity was lower in the CP group than in the control group (p = 0.038). Tissue CAT activity increased in the CP + GA group compared to the control and CP groups (p < 0.001 for both). Tissue CAT activity also increased in the GA group compared to the control and CP groups (p = 0.001 for both). Tissue AMH was lower in the CP group compared to the control group (p = 0.015), while serum AMH was higher in the GA group than in the other groups (p = 0.003, p = 0.003, and p = 0.022, respectively). No intergroup difference was observed in GPX levels. CONCLUSIONS: GA can be effective in preventing follicle cell damage caused by CP in the ovary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvuroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: