Information on the input, distribution and fate of photosynthesized carbon (C) in plant–soil systems is essential for understanding their nutrient and C dynamics. Our objectives were to: 1) quantify the input to, and distribution of, photosynthesized C by rice into selected soil C pools by using a C 14 continuous labelling technique and 2) determine the influence of the photosynthesized C input on the decomposition of native soil organic carbon (SOC) under laboratory conditions. The amounts of C 14 in soil organic C (SOC 14 ) were soil dependent, and ranged from 114.3 to 348.2 mg C kg −1 , accounting for 0.73%–1.99% of total SOC after continuous labelling for 80 days. However, the mean SOC 14 concentrations in unplanted soils (31.9–64.6 mg kg −1 ) were accounted for 21.5% of the rice-planted soils. The amounts of C 14 in the dissolved organic C (DOC 14 ) and in the microbial biomass C (MBC 14 ), as percentages of SOC 14 , were 2.21%–3.54% and 9.72%–17.97%, respectively. The DOC 14 and MBC 14 were 6.72%–14.64% and 1.70%–7.67% of total DOC and MBC respectively after 80-d of rice growth. At 80-d of labelling, the SOC 14 concentration was positively correlated with the MBC 14 concentration and rice root biomass. Rice growth promotes more photosynthesized (newly-derived) C into soil C pools compared to unplanted soils, reflecting the release of root exudates from rice roots. Laboratory incubation of photosynthesized (plant-derived) C in soil decreased the decomposition of native SOC (i.e. a negative priming effect), in some, but not all cases. If this negative priming effect of the new C on native SOC also occurs in the field in the longer term, paddy soils will probably sequester more C from the atmosphere if more photosynthesized C enters them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: