Infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS) has been used for probing the surface densities and compositions of adsorbed layers of aqueous sodium tetradecanoate, or myristate, at 25 °C. Aqueous sodium myristate normally becomes protonated (myristic acid) to an extent of about 0.5−1%, yielding a natural pH from 8 to 9, depending on concentration. The myristic acid, and possibly an acid−soap complex, are quite surface active compared to myristate, making impractical the application of the Gibbs adsorption isotherm for determining surface densities from tension data. At pH = 12 (in 10 mM NaOH), only myristate is expected in the bulk, and the tension is higher; for 2 mM total surfactant concentration, the tension is ∼ 43 mN/m vs 23 mN/m. IRRAS spectra confirm that only myristate is present in the monolayer at pH = 12. At natural pH (8−9), in addition to the band due to the myristate group, a significant band due to myristic acid is observed. Solutions in D 2 O were used for observing the carbonyl and carboxylate bands, after eliminating the H 2 O vapor noise in the polar group region (1800−1300 cm - 1 ), and for having larger reflectance-absorbance intensities due to the smaller complex refractive index of D 2 O than that of H 2 O in the hydrocarbon stretching region (2950−2850 cm - 1 ). The surface densities of adsorbed sodium myristate layers at pH = 12 as determined from tension data by using the Gibbs adsorption isotherm agree to better than 10% to those determined from IRRAS data by using the model of either an isotropic film or an anisotropic film on the surface. The surface densities at pH = 12 range from 1 × 10 - 6 to 4 × 10 - 6 mol/m 2 as the concentration increases from 0.05 to 4 mM. At pH ≈ 8−9, the surface density is 8 × 10 - 6 mol/m 2 at 4 mM, as explained by the lower tension. The frequencies of both antisymmetric and symmetric methylene stretching vibration bands are lower at natural pH, indicating more ordered and almost all-trans conformations at the higher surface densities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: