Protective clothing (PC) results in a micro-environment between itself and the body. Workers are then exposed to a heat stress greater than the ambient environment alone, which is a reflection of micro-environment, metabolic rate and time. Adjustments to the ambient environment to account for the micro-environment have been formulated as a means to predict heat strain for safety and productivity purposes. Measurement of the actual micro-environment was made for a mean of 63.1 +/- 7.9 min using a remote sensor at the shoulder, hip and thigh levels on 15 subjects during a continuous work protocol (300 kcal/h) in impermeable PC at an ambient temperature of 30.1 degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) (32 degrees C dry, 29 degrees C wet, 33 degrees C globe). Micro-environment temperature increased over the duration of the work period. There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the measurements made at the three different body sites for temperature or humidity. The mean micro-environmental WBGT at the end of work was 34.6 degrees C WBGT. Micro-environment WBGT increased rapidly in the first 20 min of work then slowed, rising only 0.5 degrees C WBGT from 40 to 60 min. These results suggest that at this particular high ambient temperature (30.1 degrees C WBGT) an adjustment factor of 5 degrees C WBGT would give a more accurate indication of thermal stress for up to 1 h of continuous moderate work within PC. For shorter work durations, an even smaller adjustment would be appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muir et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: