This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The cure schedule for carbon fiber‐reinforced, phenylethynyl‐terminated Ultem™ (GE Plastics) composites was studied in an attempt to optimize the resultant glass transition temperature, T g . Reaction progress and possible matrix degradation were monitored via the T g . On the basis of previous research, matrix degradation induced T g reduction was expected for increases in cure time or temperature beyond approximately 70 minutes at 350°C. Using the central composite design (CCD) of experiment technique, composite panels, neat resin, and polymer powder‐coated tow (towpreg) were cured following various cure schedules to allow for the measurement of the glass transition temperatures resulting fronm cure time and temperature variations. The towpreg and neat resin specimens were cured in a differential scanning calorimeter. The glass transition temperatures of all specimens were measured via differential scanning calorimetry; the composite glass transition temperatures were also measured with dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The composite panels and towpreg specimens showed similar trends in T g response to cure schedule variations. Composite and towpreg glass transition temperatures increased to a plateau with increasing cure time and temperature, whereas, the neat resin showed an optimal T g followed by T g reduction with increasing cure time and temperature. The optimal neat resin T g occurred within a cure time and temperature significantly below that required to maximize the composite and towpreg glass transition temperatures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullions et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: