Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To present the results of topography-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) after intracorneal ring segments implantation followed by corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus. METHODS: In this prospective case series, 10 patients (16 eyes) with progressive keratoconus were included. All patients underwent topography-guided transepithelial PRK after Keraring intracorneal ring segments (Mediphacos Ltda) implantation, followed by CXL treatment. The follow-up period was 6 months after the last procedure for all patients. Time interval between both intracorneal ring segments implantation and CXL and between CXL and topography-guided transepithelial PRK was 6 months. RESULTS: LogMAR mean uncorrected distance visual acuity and mean corrected distance visual acuity were significantly improved (P<.05) from 1.14±0.36 and 0.75±0.24 preoperatively to 0.25±0.13 and 0.13±0.06 after the completion of the three-step procedure, respectively. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was significantly reduced (P<.05) from -5.66±5.63 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.98±2.21 D after the three-step procedure. Mean steep and flat keratometry values were significantly reduced (P<.05) from 54.65±5.80 D and 47.80±3.97 D preoperatively to 45.99±3.12 D and 44.69±3.19 D after the three-step procedure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined topography-guided transepithelial PRK with intracorneal ring segments implantation and CXL in a three-step procedure seems to be an effective, promising treatment sequence offering patients a functional visual acuity and ceasing progression of the ectatic disorder. A longer follow-up and larger case series are necessary to thoroughly evaluate safety, stability, and efficacy of this innovative procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coşkunseven et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: