It has previously been suggested that small sperm size may be an adaptation to achieve uniparental inheritance of organelles, and hence to prevent the spread of selfish cytoplasmic elements. Such an explanation for anisogamy implies a mechanism whereby the male gamete eliminates its own cytoplasm prior to fusion with the egg. A model has been presented demonstrating the invasion and persistence of a modifier that acts gametically to kill its own organelles. Here we show, however, that this model is far from robust; indeed, if any cost is associated with the modifier it cannot persist. We also show that despite an empirically demonstrated association between anisogamy and multicellularity, this result also applies if the analysis is applied in the multicellular case. This class of model contrasts with the majority of analyses in which the modifier kills off the incoming gamete’s organelles. We show that these models are highly robust, even if uniparental inheritance is imperfect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randerson et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: