Why the study?
Do serial electrocardiographic changes in T-wave vector and polarity differ between healthy and stressed neonates?
Do serial electrocardiographic changes in T-wave vector and polarity differ between healthy and stressed neonates?
Alterations of T-wave amplitude and axis may serve as markers of myocardial ischaemia in neonates, but are only reliable after the first 24 hours of life.
T-wave flattening lags longer in stressed neonates, warranting caution before 24 hours; hypothesis-generating for ischemia markers, needs prospective confirmation.
Serial changes in T-wave vector and polarity were assessed in 162 electrocardiograms, 117 from 44 healthy term neonates and 45 from 17 stressed neonates. Records were taken at 5 to 8 hours, 24 to 33 hours, and 71 to 96 hours after birth. Sequential changes in both T-wave amplitude and frontal and horizontal axes were found in both groups. A lag period was noted between healthy and stressed infants when comparing changes in T-wave amplitude, with greater flattening of T-waves for longer periods of time after birth in the stressed group. The normal changes in T-wave axis over time in the horizontal and frontal planes showed a similar lag in the stressed group. Alterations of T-wave amplitude and axis alone may be markers of myocardial ischaemia in neonates but are only reliable signs after the first 24 hours of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jedeikin et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: