Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a chronic microbial disease, characterized by progressive enamel demineralization. Improved understanding of its pathogenesis has shifted dentistry toward minimally invasive biomimetic strategies such as Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide with antibacterial and biomimetic mineralization properties, has recently emerging as a promising alternative. Hence, this study compared the remineralization efficacy of CPP-ACP and chitosan hydrogel on artificially induced enamel lesions on primary enamel. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six extracted human molars were sectioned into four parts: sound enamel (control), demineralized enamel, and two experimental groups - Group A (CPP-ACP) and Group B (chitosan hydrogel). Demineralization was carried out for 96 h followed by remineralization using a 21-day pH-cycling model with twice-daily application of the respective agents. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was used for Ca/P ratio analysis in all specimens. Surface microhardness (SMH) was assessed using Vickers microhardness testing for all the samples. A separate subset of three samples from each group evaluated under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for surface morphological assessment. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Mann-Whitney U -tests ( P < 0.05). RESULTS: Group B demonstrated higher SMH (211.2 ± 32.5) and Ca/P ratio (1.74 ± 0.08) compared to Group A. Significant differences were observed among the groups. Pairwise analysis showed both CPP-ACP and chitosan hydrogel significantly improved the Ca/P ratio compared to demineralized enamel ( U = 66.5, P < 0.001), while the chitosan group demonstrated Ca/ P values comparable to sound enamel. SEM analysis revealed more uniform enamel-like crystal deposition in Group B. CONCLUSION: Chitosan hydrogel demonstrated superior remineralization compared to CPP-ACP, highlights its potential as a nonfluoridated, biomimetic, clinically translatable material for enamel remineralization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srujana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: