Key result
Physiologic reserve assessment tools predict pretransplant mortality, with objective tools like the Liver Frailty Index recommended for consistent clinical and research use.
Why the study?
Physiologic reserve is an important prognostic indicator, but no single test can measure it, and heterogeneity in definitions and tools has prevented a clear role in transplant assessment.
Consistent use of objective tools to measure physiologic reserve and frailty is recommended to improve prognostic assessment in liver transplantation.
Frailty tools may refine pretransplant mortality prediction; leaves open which best forecast posttransplant survival.
Physiologic reserve is an important prognostic indicator. Because of its complexity, no single test can measure an individual's physiologic reserve. Frailty is the phenotypic expression of decreased reserve and portends poor prognosis. Both subjective and objective tools have been used to measure one or more components of physiologic reserve. Most of these tools appear to predict pretransplant mortality, but only some predict posttransplant survival. Incorporation of these measures of physiologic reserve in the clinical and research settings including prediction models are reviewed, and the applicability to patient-related outcomes are discussed. Commonly used tools, in patients with cirrhosis, that have been associated with clinical outcomes were reviewed. The strength of subjective tools lies in low-cost, wide availability, and quick assessments at the bedside. A disadvantage of these tools is the manipulative capacity, restricting their value in allocation processes. The strength of objective tests lies in objective measurements and the ability to measure change. The disadvantages include complexity, increased cost, and limited accessibility. Heterogeneity in the definitions and tools used has prevented further advancement or a clear role in transplant assessment. Consistent use of objective tools, including the 6-minute walk test, gait speed, Liver Frailty Index, or Short Physical Performance Battery, are recommended in clinical and research settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhanji et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cirrhosis and liver transplantation. Physiologic reserve assessment tools was evaluated on Pretransplant mortality and posttransplant survival. Physiologic reserve assessment tools predict pretransplant mortality, with objective tools like the Liver Frailty Index recommended for consistent clinical and research use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: