Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proteolytic systems and the aggresome pathway contribute to preventing accumulation of cytotoxic aggregation-prone proteins. Although polyubiquitylation is usually required for degradation or aggresome formation, several substrates are processed independently of ubiquitin through a poorly understood mechanism. Here, we found that p62/SQSTM1, a multifunctional adaptor protein, was involved in the selective autophagic clearance of a non-ubiquitylated substrate, namely an aggregation-prone isoform of STAT5A (STAT5A_ΔE18). By using a cell line that stably expressed STAT5A_ΔE18, we investigated the properties of its aggregation and degradation. We found that STAT5A_ΔE18 formed non-ubiquitylated aggresomes and/or aggregates by impairment of proteasome functioning or autophagy. Transport of these aggregates to the perinuclear region was inhibited by trichostatin A or tubacin, inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC), indicating that the non-ubiquitylated aggregates of STAT5A_ΔE18 were sequestered into aggresomes in an HDAC6-dependent manner. Moreover, p62 was bound to STAT5A_ΔE18 through its PB1 domain, and the oligomerization of p62 was required for this interaction. In p62-knockdown experiments, we found that p62 was required for autophagic clearance of STAT5A_ΔE18 but not for its aggregate formation, suggesting that the binding of p62 to non-ubiquitylated substrates might trigger their autophagic clearance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: