Key result
Elevated troponin-I in acute liver failure patients was not significantly associated with increased mortality compared to normal levels (55% vs 45%, p=0.195) in a discussed UK cohort.
Why the study?
Does elevated troponin-I predict mortality and poor outcome in ICU patients with acute liver failure?
Does elevated troponin-I predict mortality and poor outcome in ICU patients with acute liver failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 45%
p-value: p=0.195
The prognostic value of elevated troponin-I in acute liver failure remains debated, as it may reflect metabolic stress and multiorgan failure rather than true myocardial injury.
Acute liver failure in ICU patients is an often fatal condition in which many patients may die of multiple organ failure in the absence of liver transplantation. In this setting, cardiac injury may be associated with or precipitate a fatal outcome. Troponin-I is a well-established, specific, and sensitive surrogate of acute coronaropathy, with both diagnostic and prognostic value. Troponin-I elevation in acute liver failure patients is common, ranging from 60 to 75%, and probably multifactorial. Despite a previous well-conducted US study showing that elevated troponin-I is associated with an independent risk of poor outcome and mortality, a recent UK study did not confirm these data and reported contradictory results. Troponin-I elevation observed in acute liver failure may therefore not represent true myocardial injury and may be better viewed as a marker of metabolic stress. The debate on the significance of elevated troponin-I in acute liver failure patients is revived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaber et al. (2013) conducted an editorial in Acute liver failure (n=218). Elevated troponin-I (>0.05 μg/l) vs. Normal troponin-I was evaluated on Mortality (p=0.195). Elevated troponin-I in acute liver failure patients was not significantly associated with increased mortality compared to normal levels (55% vs 45%, p=0.195) in a discussed UK cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: