The paper from Macho et al. (3) describes the suitability of chloromethyl-X-rosamine (CMXRos) as an aldehydefixable potential-sensitive fluorochrome to be used for the detection of mitochondrial transmembrane potential ( m ) changes during early apoptosis. In our opinion, the data presented in the paper do not fully support the interpretation that a straightforward correlation between CMXRos binding and m exists. In that Figure Treatment with mCICCP, an uncoupling agent that dissipates m , induces a reduction of CMXRos (and DiOC6) signal of more than 2 logs (from near 400 to near 2 channels of fluorescence). These data do not match those obtained in the single-color experiments described in Figure Thus, there is more than 1 log difference in the fluorescence signal generated by the same amount of CMXRos, depending on whether the latter is used alone or in combination with DiOC 6 . Such behavior suggests a spillover of the DiOC 6 ''green'' signal into the ''red'' channel in which the fluorescence of CMXRos is collected. In this light, much of the CMXRos fluorescence measured in double-color experiments would actually reflect DiOC 6 fluorescence and underlies the straight correlation seen between the two fluorochromes: dissipating m will reduce DiOC 6 -generated fluorescence, thereby rendering it no longer strong enough to produce the ''red'' signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferlini et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: