Synthetic study reveals the generation and electrophilic reactivity of a terminal iron(IV) nitride complex, highlighting mechanisms for selective nitrogen-atom transfer.
Utilizing the bulky guanidinate ligand [L Ar* ] − (L Ar* = (Ar*N) 2 C(R), Ar* = 2,6-bis(diphenylmethyl)-4- tert -butylphenyl, R = NC t Bu 2 ) for kinetic stabilization, the synthesis of a rare terminal Fe(IV) nitride complex is reported. UV irradiation of a pyridine solution of the Fe(II) azide [L Ar* ]FeN 3 (py) ( 3-py ) at 0 °C cleanly generates the Fe(IV) nitride [L Ar* ]FeN(py) ( 1 ). The 15 N NMR spectrum of the 1 15 N (50% Fe≡ 15 N) isotopomer shows a resonance at 1016 ppm (vs externally referenced CH 3 NO 2 at 380 ppm), comparable to that known for other terminal iron nitrides. Notably, the computed structure of 1 reveals an iron center with distorted tetrahedral geometry, τ 4 = 0.72, featuring a short Fe≡N bond (1.52 Å). Inspection of the frontier orbital ordering of 1 shows a relatively small HOMO/LUMO gap with the LUMO comprised by Fe(d xz, yz )N(p x, y ) π*-orbitals, a splitting that is manifested in the electronic absorption spectrum of 1 (λ = 610 nm, ε = 1375 L·mol –1 ·cm –1; λ = 613 nm (calcd)). Complex 1 persists in low-temperature solutions of pyridine but becomes unstable at room temperature, gradually converting to the Fe(II) hydrazide product [κ 2 -( t Bu 2 CN)C(η 6 -NAr*)( N -NAr*)]Fe ( 4 ) upon standing via intramolecular N-atom insertion. This reactivity of the Fe≡N moiety was assessed through molecular orbital analysis, which suggests electrophilic character at the nitride functionality. Accordingly, treatment of 1 with the nucleophiles PMe 2 Ph and Ar–N≡C (Ar = 2,6-dimethylphenyl) leads to partial N-atom transfer and formation of the Fe(II) addition products [L Ar* ]Fe(N═PMe 2 Ph)(py) ( 5 ) and [L Ar* ]Fe(N═C═NAr)(py) ( 6 ). Similarly, 1 reacts with PhSiH 3 to give [L Ar* ]Fe[N(H)(SiH 2 Ph)](py) ( 7 ) which Fukui analysis shows to proceed via electrophilic insertion of the nitride into the Si–H bond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maity et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: