Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of the two successive fractionation procedures resulted in the preparation of an esterase-rich fraction which was capable of detoxifying endotoxin. The partial inhibition of esterase activity—but not detoxifying power—by DFP or TEPP indicated that the final Sephadex Fraction II contained a cholinesterase-type enzyme not involved in the detoxification reaction. The concentration of DFP employed was sufficient to have inhibited the esterolytic activity of proteases such as trypsin or chymotrypsin, if present. Consequently, the bulk of the enzyme in Fraction II which was active in the detoxification of endotoxin is considered for the present to be an esterase of the nonspecific, carboxylic type. Most of the esterase activity present in DEAE-cellulose Fractions I and III (Fig. 1) was inhibited by DFP and these fractions possessed only a weak capacity to inactivate endotoxin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skarnes et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: