Key result
A 2-year multi-intervention strategy did not significantly influence angiographic progression of coronary artery disease at 7 years compared to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes is unclear, and whether its progression could be modulated with a multi-intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk was unknown.
Does a 2-year structured multi-intervention reduce the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease at 7 years in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=56)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does a 2-year structured multi-intervention reduce the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease at 7 years in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
In asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of silent coronary artery disease is extremely high (84%), and a 2-year intensive multi-intervention did not significantly alter angiographic CAD progression at 7 years compared to standard care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
2-year multi-intervention does not reduce 7-year CAD progression in asymptomatic T2D; confirms high silent CAD prevalence and questions durability of short-term intensive care.
Aims The prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is unclear. We investigated the extent and prevalence of asymptomatic CAD in T2D patients by utilizing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and whether CAD progression, evaluated by ICA, could be modulated with a multi-intervention to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk. Methods Fifty-six T2D patients with ≥ 1 additional CV risk factor participated in a 2 year randomized controlled study comparing hospital-based multi-intervention (multi, n = 30) versus standard care (stand, n = 26), with a pre-planned follow-up at year seven. They underwent ICA at baseline and both ICA and IVUS at year seven. ICA was described by conventional CAD severity and extent scores. IVUS was described by maximal intimal thickness (MIT), percent and total atheroma volume and compared with individuals without T2D and CAD (heart transplant donors who had IVUS performed 7–11 weeks post-transplant, n = 147). Results Despite CV risk reduction in multi after 2 years intervention, there was no between-group difference in the progression of CAD at year seven. Overall, the prevalence of CAD defined by MIT ≥ 0.5 mm in the T2DM subjects was 84%, and as compared to the non-T2DM controls there was a significantly higher atheroma burden (mean MIT, PAV and TAV in the T2D population were 0.75 ± 0.27 mm, 33.8 ± 9.8% and 277.0 ± 137.3 mm3 as compared to 0.41 ± 0.19 mm, 17.8 ± 7.3% and 134.9 ± 100.6 mm3 in the reference population). Conclusion We demonstrated that a 2 year multi-intervention, despite improvement in CV risk factors, did not influence angiographic progression of CAD. Further, IVUS revealed that the prevalence of asymptomatic CAD in T2D patients is high, suggesting a need for a broader residual CV risk management using alternative approaches. Trial registration Clinical trials.gov id: NCT00133718 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00133718 )
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arora et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=56). Hospital-based multi-intervention vs. Standard care was evaluated on Mean maximal intimal thickness (MIT) at 7 years (p=0.43). A 2-year multi-intervention strategy did not significantly influence angiographic progression of coronary artery disease at 7 years compared to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: