Key result
Fimasartan is being evaluated for non-inferiority compared to perindopril in lowering sitting systolic blood pressure over 8 weeks in a planned randomized controlled trial of 238 elderly patients with essential hypertension.
Why the study?
To confirm the safety and the non-inferiority of the blood pressure-lowering effect of fimasartan compared with perindopril in elderly patients with hypertension.
Does fimasartan reduce sitting systolic blood pressure non-inferiorly to perindopril in elderly patients (≥70 years) with essential hypertension?
RCT (n=238)
Double-blind
Stratified block randomization
Yes
Does fimasartan reduce sitting systolic blood pressure non-inferiorly to perindopril in elderly patients (≥70 years) with essential hypertension?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of fimasartan compared to perindopril in lowering blood pressure among elderly patients with essential hypertension.
Fimasartan is noninferior to perindopril for BP reduction in elderly hypertension with similar safety; extends RCT evidence supporting ARBs as alternatives in this population.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, even in the elderly. Fimasartan is a new non-peptide angiotensin II receptor blocker with a selective type I receptor blocking effect. The objective of this study is to confirm the safety and the non-inferiority of the blood pressure-lowering effect of fimasartan compared with those of perindopril, which has been proven safe and effective in elderly patients with hypertension. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, two-parallel group, optional-titration, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of fimasartan and perindopril arginine. The study population consists of individuals 70 years old or older with essential hypertension. The primary outcome will be a change in sitting systolic blood pressure from baseline after the administration of the investigational product for 8 weeks. The secondary outcomes will be a change in sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline and changes in sitting systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure from baseline after the administration of the investigational product for 4, 16, and 24 weeks. The sample size will be 119 subjects for each group to confer enough power to test for the primary outcome. DISCUSSION: Research to confirm the efficacy and safety of a new medicine compared with those of previously proven anti-hypertensive drugs is beneficial to guide physicians in the selection of therapeutic agents. If it is confirmed that the new drug is not inferior to the existing drug, the drug will be considered as an option in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246555 , registered on July 25, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Essential hypertension (n=238). Fimasartan vs. Perindopril arginine 2.5 mg to 5 mg daily was evaluated on Change in sitting systolic blood pressure from baseline at 8 weeks. Fimasartan is being evaluated for non-inferiority compared to perindopril in lowering sitting systolic blood pressure over 8 weeks in a planned randomized controlled trial of 238 elderly patients with essential hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: