Key result
The reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine significantly reduced the percentage of viremic pigs to 20% at 28 days post-challenge compared to 100% in non-vaccinated controls (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does a reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine reduce PCV2 viremia in PCV2 challenged pigs?
RCT (n=40)
Single-blind
Randomly divided
No
Does a reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine reduce PCV2 viremia in PCV2 challenged pigs?
The reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine induces protective humoral and cellular immunity, leading to a reduction in PCV2 viremia in challenged pigs.
BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to elucidate the humoral and cellular immune response mechanisms by which a reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine reduces the PCV2 viremia. Forty PCV2 seronegative 3-week-old pigs were randomly divided into the following four groups: vaccinated challenged (T01), vaccinated non-challenged (T02), non-vaccinated challenged (T03), and non-vaccinated non-challenged (T04) animals. The pigs in groups T01 and T02 were immunized with a reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine (Fostera™ PCV; Pfizer Animal Health) administered as a 2.0 ml dose at 21 days of age. At 35 days of age (0 days post-challenge), the pigs in groups T01 and T03 were inoculated intranasally with 2 ml each of PCV2b. RESULTS: A reduction of PCV2 viremia coincided with the appearance of both PCV2-specific neutralizing antibodies (NA) and interferon-γ-secreting cells (IFN-γ-SCs) in the vaccinated animals. However, the presence of anti-PCV2 IgG antibodies did not correlate with the reduction of PCV2 viremia. Lymphocyte subset analysis indicated that the numbers of CD3+ and CD4+ cells increased in vaccinated animals but the numbers of CD4+ cells decreased transiently in non-vaccinated animals. The observation of a delayed type hypersensitivity response in only the vaccinated animals also supports a CD4+ cell-associated protective cellular immune response induced by the reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of PCV2-specific NA and IFN-γ-SCs, and CD4+ cells by the reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine is the important protective immune response leading to reduction of the PCV2 viremia and control of the PCV2 infection. To our knowledge this is the first demonstration of protective humoral and cellular immunity induced by the reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine and its effect on reduction of PCV2 viremia by vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection (n=40). Reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine (Fostera™ PCV) vs. Non-vaccinated challenged was evaluated on Percentage of viremic pigs at 28 days post-challenge (p=<0.05). The reformulated inactivated chimeric PCV1-2 vaccine significantly reduced the percentage of viremic pigs to 20% at 28 days post-challenge compared to 100% in non-vaccinated controls (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: