An exact expression for the decay of the transverse magnetization of spins diffusing in a field (B₀+g₁z+g₂{z}²)z^ reveals that a natural length scale{l}c=(8D/γ{g}₂)1/4, and a frequency associated with it Ω₀=4D/lc² govern the problem. Here D is the diffusion constant and {γ} is the gyromagnetic ratio. lc is the size of the packet of magnetization at long times, i.e., Ω₀t{}1. For porous media we estimate lc{~}(Rₚ{l}*)1/2 where Rₚ is the pore size and l*2=D/{Δ}{ω}, where {Δ}{ω} is the spread in Larmor frequency (inhomogeneous broadening). For typical experimental conditions, l*{~}3 {μ}m; therefore in rocks the effects of the extrema of the magnetic field can be as important as the wall effects. To estimate finite-pore-size effects we localize the spins in a potential well of size Rₚ.We find that the effective pore size is lc or Rₚ, whichever is smaller. At short times, the magnetization density {}M(z,t){}{~}exp[-Dγ²(g₁+2g₂z)²{t}³$/3], i.e., it is permissible to use an effective local gradient. The magnetization decays rapidly where the magnetic field varies rapidly---thus the magnetization accumulates at the extremum of the field. At long times, the magnetization decays as exp(-Ω₀t/2), as opposed to exp(-t³), in a uniform gradient. The phase distribution is not Gaussian, which leads the decay rate Ω₀{~} {}g₂ to be a nonanalytic function of g₂. There is an overall shift Ω₀/2 (the ``g-shift'') in the effective Larmor frequency, due to diffusion. The signal from a pulse-field-gradient experiment is similar to that of an isolated pore of size lc. We compute the Hahn- and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill-(CPMG-) echo envelopes and find qualitative agreement with experimental data on porous media. Extracting g₂ from the observed inhomogeneous broadening gives correct crossover times toward the linear regime. The slopes of the CPMG envelopes depend linearly on pulse spacing, as observed experimentally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doussal et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: