Manual kneading of the organometallic complex [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)2] with solid fumaric, succinic, tridecanedioic, terephthalic, trimesic and thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acids generated the corresponding adducts, whether salts or molecular complexes: [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)(η5-C5H4-C5H4NH)][HOOC(CH)2COO]·CH3OH, [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)(η5-C5H4-C5H4NH)][HOOC(CH2)2COO]·[HOOC(CH2)2COOH], [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)2]·[HOOC(CH2)11COOH]·2CH3OH, [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)2]·[HOOC(C6H4)COOH], [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4NH)2][C6H3(COOH)2(COO)]2 and 3{[Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)(η5-C5H4-C5H4NH)][HOOC(SC4H2)COO]}·[Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4N)2]·2[HOOC(SC4H2)COOH]. Direct reaction in solution yielded the same compounds, which were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction, thus allowing comparison of observed and calculated powder diffraction patterns. Kneading of the organometallic complex with maleic acid, on the other hand, yielded a different product from the one obtained via reaction in solution, which was characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction as the salt [Fe(η5-C5H4-C5H4NH)2][HOOC(CH)2COO]2. The solid–solid processes described herein imply molecular diffusion through the lattice and breaking and reassembling of hydrogen bonded networks with or without proton transfer from acid to base.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braga et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: