Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rod-shaped 4-methylbenzoic acid-N′-(4′-n-alkoxybenzoyl) hydrazide (series I) have been synthesized by the Schotten–Baumann reaction of 4-methylbenzhydrazide with 4-n-alkoxy benzoyl chloride using dry pyridine, as a solvent. The series I compounds have been cyclized to bent-shaped mesogenic 2-(4′-methylphenyl)-5-(4″-n-alkoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazoles (series II) and 2-(4′-methylphenyl)-5-(4″-n-alkoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole (series III) using POCl3 and Lawesson's reagent, respectively. The synthesized compounds are characterized by the combination of elemental analysis and standard spectroscopic methods. In series II, lower and middle members are non-mesogenic. n-Dodecyloxy to n-hexadecyloxy derivatives exhibit enantiotropic nematic mesophase. In series III, all the compounds synthesized exhibit enantiotropic nematic mesophase. n-Tetradecyloxy and n-hexadecyloxy derivatives also exhibit enantiotropic SmA mesophase. The mesomorphic properties of the series II and III used in this study are compared with each other and with other structurally related compound to evaluate the effect of different heterocyclic moieties as well as terminal substituents on mesomorphism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prajapati et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: