Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: A mixture of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and bupivacaine was developed to achieve the fast-onset anesthetic effect of lidocaine and the long-lasting effect of bupivacaine. The authors compared pain scores between 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine-bupivicaine mixture during local anesthesia for eyelid surgeries. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, prospective, comparative study. In total, 120 consecutive patients (43 males, 77 females, mean age = 47.2 ± 21.2) who underwent bilateral eyelid surgery under subcutaneous anesthesia were asked to report pain scores for each eye during the first injection of anesthesia. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive 1 of the 3 anesthetic agents in 1 eyelid, and 1 of the remaining 2 agents in the other. RESULTS: The pH values of the 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine-bupivicaine mixture were 6.23 ± 0.21, 4.21 ± 0.37, and 3.87 ± 0.19, respectively. The pain scores of each were 4.3 ± 1.8, 5.1 ± 1.8, and 5.7 ± 1.9, respectively. The 2% lidocaine with epinephrine produced a statistically significantly higher pain score than 2% lidocaine (p = 0.044, generalized estimating equation method). The mixture also showed a significantly higher pain score than 2% lidocaine (p = 0.003, generalized estimating equation method). CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine seemed to increase subjective pain scores. Compared with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, 2% lidocaine with epinephrine-bupivicaine mixture was not significantly different in terms of subjective symptoms or pH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: