Five formations and part of a sixth were examined in order to resolve conflicting reports as to their age and lateral relationship. The formations are redescribed at their type sections and equivalent strata are described at a control section. It is concluded that the Lower Cambrian Mural, Mahto, and Hota Formations and the Middle Cambrian Chetang Formation are valid and that the Tah (= Mural) and Adolphus (= Hota) Formations should be suppressed. The boundary between the Nevadella and Bonnia-Olenellus Zone falls within the middle unit of the Mural. The Lower – Middle Cambrian boundary is located at or very near the contact between the Hota and overlying Chetang Formation. This is a sharp lithologic contract, but no physical evidence of an unconformity was noted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fritz et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: