be put into circulation.We are already in the van with co-operative bird study and we now have the chance to consolidate our position by setting a high standard in our journal.Primarily this means meticulous accuracy over facts.Where there is any doubt-and in field observations there often will be-this must be made clear.The writer must distinguish between figures which are estimates and those which are actual counts and he must differentiate between what he is sure about and what appears to have happened.Provided this accuracy is maintained the recognition of Bird Study as an authoritative scientific journal can be assured.This recognition will make for a wide circulation and a corresponding sense of achievement to those who are furthering the new journal's progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacquomo Monk (1954) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: