The curved plots of (carbene adduct)/(carbene-rearrangement product) versus carbene trapping agent, tetramethylene [TME], reported with benzylchlorodiazirine 1 have been reproduced. However, with the use of a non-nitrogenous precursor, plots of this type are approximately linear over the range of [TME] employed. Thus, any complex formed between benzylchlorocarbene and TME must collapse to form cyclopropane faster then it can fragment with rearrangement to β-chlorostyrene and TME. Diazirine 1 does photoisomerize to diazo compound 7, but this process is inefficient (φ = 0.075) and is not likely to be responsible for the curvature in plots of adduct/styrene versus [TME] observed with the diazirine precursor. Thus, the second, noncarbene, pathway to β-chlorostyrene is neither a carbene−olefin complex nor a diazo intermediate. It is proposed that the second pathway involves a rearrangement in the excited state of the diazirine, although other explanations cannot be discarded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nigam et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: