Key result
Ischemic ECG changes during adenosine stress testing in patients with normal myocardial perfusion scans were not associated with an increased risk of future adverse cardiac events.
Why the study?
Do ischemic ECG changes during adenosine infusion increase the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with normal myocardial perfusion images?
Cohort (n=137)
Do ischemic ECG changes during adenosine infusion increase the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with normal myocardial perfusion images?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0.9%
Ischemic ECG changes during adenosine stress testing in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging do not confer an increased risk of future adverse cardiac events.
Adenosine-induced ST depression with normal MPI signals no added cardiac risk; leaves open whether ECG adds prognostic value beyond perfusion imaging.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the prognostic importance of adenosine-induced ischemic ECG changes in patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion images (MPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 765 patients undergoing adenosine MPI between January 2013 and January 2015. Patients with baseline ECG abnormalities and/or abnormal scan were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 67 (8.7%) patients had ischemic ECG changes during adenosine infusion in the form of ST depression of 1 mm or more. Of these, 29 [43% (3.8% of all patients)] had normal MPI (positive ECG group). An age-matched and sex-matched group of 108 patients with normal MPI without ECG changes served as control participants (negative ECG group). During a mean follow-up duration of 33.3±6.1 months, patients in the positive ECG group did not have significantly more adverse cardiac events than those in the negative ECG group. One (0.9%) patient in the negative ECG group had a nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.7% annual event rate after a negative MPI). Also in this group, two (1.8%) patients admitted with a diagnosis of CAD where they have been ruled out by angiography. A fourth case in this, in the negative ECG group, was admitted because of heart failure that proved to be secondary to a pulmonary cause and not CAD. A case only in the positive ECG group was admitted as a CAD that was ruled out by coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: Patients with normal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in whom ST-segment depression develops during adenosine stress test appear to have no increased risk for future cardiac events compared with similar patients without ECG evidence of ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niaz et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Normal myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress testing (n=137). Ischemic ECG changes during adenosine infusion vs. No ischemic ECG changes was evaluated on Adverse cardiac events. Ischemic ECG changes during adenosine stress testing in patients with normal myocardial perfusion scans were not associated with an increased risk of future adverse cardiac events.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: