Key result
Perfusion imaging can stratify patients with chronic coronary artery disease into low (<1%), intermediate (1-3%), and high (>3%) annual risk for major coronary events to guide revascularization.
Why the study?
Does perfusion imaging effectively stratify the risk of major coronary events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease to guide revascularization versus medical management?
Does perfusion imaging effectively stratify the risk of major coronary events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease to guide revascularization versus medical management?
Perfusion imaging can stratify patients with chronic coronary artery disease into low, intermediate, and high risk for major coronary events, helping to guide decisions between medical management and revascularization.
May support perfusion imaging for risk stratification in chronic CAD; leaves open whether it guides revascularization versus medical therapy.
or many patients with chronic coronary artery disease, risk stratification as to likelihood of cardiac death lays at the basis of choosing between the two major therapeutic options of medical management or revascularisation. The target population is those with an intermediate risk of cardiac death, as patients known to be at high or low risk are already adequately risk stratified for clinical decisions. Perfusion imaging is frequently used for these purposes because it can separate patients into low (, 1%), intermediate (1–3%), and high (. 3%) likelihoods for the major coronary events. In general, contemplation for revascularisation therapy for patients with mild to moderate symptoms would depend on the likelihood of a major coronary event being greater than 3 % per year, in whom revascularisation may confer a survival advantage. Someone with a, 1 % annual event rate might
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy M. Bateman (2004) conducted a review in chronic coronary artery disease. Perfusion imaging was evaluated on major coronary events. Perfusion imaging can stratify patients with chronic coronary artery disease into low (<1%), intermediate (1-3%), and high (>3%) annual risk for major coronary events to guide revascularization.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: