Error equations for angles of polarizers and analyzers are formulated for null ellipsometry with a seriously imperfect compensator. Analytic solutions of ellipsometric errors δψ and δΔ for metallic samples show dependence on sin2(δτ/2)/cos δτ, where δτ is the retardation deviation from a quarter-wave. The analytic solutions agree with results both from the direct computer simulation of null ellipsometry and from the numerical solutions for the error equations. Errors for data for a metallic sample agree with those predicted from the analytic solutions, and data after error reductions give accurate estimates for the complex refractive index and the surface roughness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soe-Mie F. Nee (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: