Key result
Implantation of the Micra leadless pacemaker in two children with paroxysmal third-degree AV block resulted in no complications or adverse events over a 2-year follow-up.
Why the study?
Leadless pacemakers decrease major complications compared to transvenous pacemakers, which may be of particular importance in children and young adults facing lifetime complications.
Is the implantation of leadless pacemakers safe and feasible in children with paroxysmal third-degree atrioventricular block?
Case Report (n=2)
Is the implantation of leadless pacemakers safe and feasible in children with paroxysmal third-degree atrioventricular block?
Leadless pacemaker implantation is feasible and safe in children requiring infrequent ventricular pacing, offering a potential alternative to transvenous systems.
Feasibility of leadless pacing shown in a young patient; leaves open long-term safety data before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND: A leadless pacemaker is a new concept in which a miniaturized pacing device is self-contained within the heart. Recently published data show that leadless pacemakers are associated with a decreased risk of major complications when compared with transvenous cardiac pacemakers. This seems to be of particular importance in children and young adults in whom various complications may occur during their lifetime. CASE SUMMARY: Herein, we report the successful implantation of Micra™ Transcatheter Pacing System in two children: 12-year-old boy and 13-year-old girl, along with a long-term follow-up. The children had indications for pacemaker implantation, however, with an expected low percentage of pacing due to paroxysmal nature of the third-degree atrioventricular block. The implantation procedures were performed in general anaesthesia. There were no complications. During the 2-year follow-up, there were no adverse events and the electrical parameters of the device remained stable. Pacing percentage was below 0.1%. DISCUSSION: Transvenous cardiac pacemakers improve quality of life and reduce mortality but may be associated with various short- and long-term complications, mainly related to the presence of transvenous leads and the pulse generator. Compared with adult patients, the implantation of conventional pacemakers in children is still a challenge, not only because of their smaller size but also due to continuing growth, as well as a higher rate of lead and device-related complications. We demonstrate that the implantation of leadless pacemakers in children is feasible and could be worth considering in certain clinical scenarios, especially when ventricular pacing is required rarely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jędrzejczyk‐Patej et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Paroxysmal third-degree atrioventricular block (n=2). Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (leadless pacemaker) was evaluated on Complications and adverse events. Implantation of the Micra leadless pacemaker in two children with paroxysmal third-degree AV block resulted in no complications or adverse events over a 2-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: