Key result
Polyurethane unipolar pacing leads showed similar performance to silicone unipolar leads, but polyurethane bipolar leads did not perform as well as silicone bipolar leads.
Why the study?
Does the performance of polyurethane pacing leads differ from silicone pacing leads in patients monitored via transtelephonic follow-up?
Population
Patients with implantable pacing leads manufactured by five major manufacturers in the United States…
Comparison
Polyurethane pacing leads (unipolar and bipolar) vs Silicone pacing leads (unipolar and bipolar)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May caution against polyurethane bipolar leads; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice without randomized confirmation.
Observational
Does the performance of polyurethane pacing leads differ from silicone pacing leads in patients monitored via transtelephonic follow-up?
Transtelephonic monitoring data reveals that while polyurethane unipolar pacing leads perform similarly to silicone ones, polyurethane bipolar leads exhibit inferior performance.
Kim et al. (1990) conducted an observational in Patients with implantable pacing leads. Polyurethane pacing leads vs. Silicone pacing leads was evaluated on Complications arising from pacing leads. Polyurethane unipolar pacing leads showed similar performance to silicone unipolar leads, but polyurethane bipolar leads did not perform as well as silicone bipolar leads.