Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Three clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates (A-C) were isolated from three separate patients during an outbreak in a hospital in Krakow, Poland. Isolate A was recovered first and was susceptible to carbapenems, whereas isolates B and C were resistant. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in carbapenem susceptibility in these outbreak-related isolates. METHODS: Clonal relatedness was determined using rep-PCR-based DiversiLab. The bla(OXA-51-like) genes and their upstream regions were sequenced. Expression of the genes encoding OXA-51-like and the three major porins CarO, OprD-like and 33-36 kDa Omp were investigated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Comparison of outer membrane protein (OMP) profiles was performed using SDS-PAGE. ISAba1-bla(OXA-82) was cloned into the shuttle vector pWH1266 and transferred into A. baumannii ATCC 17978. RESULTS: The isolates were identical by rep-PCR and clustered with international clonal lineage 2. Sequencing of bla(OXA-51-like) revealed a conversion of OXA-66 (isolate A) into OXA-82 (isolates B and C). bla(OXA-82) was also associated with ISAba1. Expression analysis revealed overexpression of bla(OXA-82). There was no difference in OMP expression between the isolates. ISAba1-bla(OXA-82) conferred carbapenem resistance in ATCC 17978. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem resistance in outbreak-related isolates was mediated by conversion of OXA-66 into OXA-82 and its subsequent overexpression. This further highlights the genome plasticity of A. baumannii, leading to carbapenem resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zander et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: