Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The introduction of routine childhood vaccination with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) has led to a decrease in the overall incidence of pneumococcal disease in all ages and a change in the serotype distribution of the remaining disease. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating ≥65 years and at risk adults with either the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) or the 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in the UK, accounting for epidemiological changes. METHODS: A population-based Markov model was used to track one UK-based cohort of individuals assuming PPV23, PCV13 or no vaccination until death. RESULTS: The ICER was estimated at £8413 when PPV23 was compared to no vaccination. PPV23 dominated PCV13. CONCLUSION: This model suggests that vaccinating with PPV23 is cost-effective when compared to both PCV13 and no vaccination. As PPV23 covers 80-90% in the UK of all serotypes causing invasive pneumococcal diseases, it remains cost-effective despite recent reductions in invasive pneumococcal diseases incidence in adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: