Dear Sir, Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) continues to be a serious and potentially life‐threatening complication of ovarian stimulation. A World Health Organization report states that the world‐wide incidence of severe OHSS is 0.2–1% of all assisted reproduction cycles, with a 1:45 000–1:50 000 mortality per infertile women receiving gonadotrophins. Following IVF, the overall incidence of OHSS is estimated at 0.6–14% (Hugues, 2002). Not surprisingly, continuous efforts have been invested in tools that will enable prediction and ultimately prevention of OHSS. In his recent debate article, Orvieto (2003) discusses the chaotic problem of OHSS prediction. In short, current prediction strategies appear to be unreliable, and additional studies are needed to establish new prediction guidelines. The frustration with this current situation intensifies in light of the fact that for more than a decade the fertility community had in its arsenal a most reliable strategy that totally prevents OHSS (Itskovitz et al., 1991). Since then, numerous publications have described the astonishing phenomenon of total luteolysis and OHSS prevention following GnRH agonist‐triggered ovulation (even in extreme responses to ovarian stimulation). The recent introduction of GnRH antagonists was predicted to increase the interest in this approach (Itskovitz‐Eldor et al., 2000; Kol and Itskovitz‐Eldor, 2000). Those who object to this winning strategy for OHSS prevention keep citing a paper by van der Meer et al. (1993). Indeed, this unfortunate publication was the focus of a previous debate (Kol et al., 1996). In short, three patients prepared for intrauterine insemination were incompletely triggered with a nasal GnRH agonist preparation (Suprefact), and developed mild to moderate OHSS. Although of marginal significance in the context of OHSS prevention, given its impressive title, this paper has been cited (see WHO publication above) time and again to show that there is no magic bullet to OHSS prevention (do I hear a deep sigh of relief?…). After all, it is inconceivable that the fertility community puts so many patients (for so many years) in danger of OHSS, while a simple treatment exists that prevents it altogether. Sorry, there is a magic bullet! If ovulation is triggered with indictable preparations (we use 0.2 mg of triptorelin), it is guaranteed that OHSS with be totally avoided with good clinical outcome (pregnancy rate) if adequate luteal support is given. I urge the fertility community to put this approach to the test. This may help to prevent countless hospitalizations and even deaths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahar Kol (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: