This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Three-dimensional atomic force microscopy (3D-AFM) has been a powerful tool to probe the atomic-scale structure of solid–liquid interfaces. As a nanoprobe moves along the 3D volume of interfacial liquid, the probe–sample interaction force is sensed and mapped, providing information on not only the solid morphology, but also the liquid density distribution. To date, 3D-AFM force maps of a diverse set of solid–liquid interfaces have been recorded, revealing remarkable force oscillations that are typically attributed to solvation layers or electrical double layers. However, despite the high resolution down to the subangstrom level, quantitative interpretation of the 3D force maps has been an outstanding challenge. Here we review the technical details of 3D-AFM and the existing approaches for quantitative data interpretation. Based on evidence in recent literature, we conclude that the perturbation-induced AFM force paradoxically represents the intrinsic, unperturbed liquid density profile. We will further discuss how the oscillatory force profiles can be attributed to the probe-modulation of the liquid configurational entropy and how the quantitative, atomic-scale liquid density distribution can be derived from the force maps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: