Forty-two crossbred weanling pigs, equalized between gilts and barrows, were fed ad libitum in two replicates of seven dietary treatments. Diets contained 0, 5, or 10% unprocessed ground rapeseed of Brassica campestris type with or without propionic acid (PA) at a level of 10% of the rapeseed. Rapeseed was treated with PA prior to grinding. Additional pigs were fed diets containing 1 or 4% PA. Feed intake decreased, but not significantly when the diet contained rapeseed or 4% PA. Pigs fed the diet without rapeseed or PA gained 0.65 kg/day and required 2.79 kg feed/leg gain. Daily gain (0.47 kg) was lowest (P < 0.01) for pigs receiving 10% rapeseed with those receiving 5% rapeseed being intermediate between those fed 0 or 10% rapeseed. The addition of PA to a diet containing 10% rapeseed improved (P < 0.01) gain. Digestible energy (DE) in the diet containing 10% rapsseed was less efficiently (P < 0.01) utilized than DE in the basal diet with 0% rape-seed, even though digestibility studies suggested no depression in DE or metabolizable energy values from rapeseed addition. Nitrogen digestibility (DN) was higher (P < 0.05) at 88.5% for pigs fed 10% rapeseed plus PA than for the control pigs in which DN averaged 83.5% with other treatments being intermediate. Carcass measurements were not significantly influenced by treatment. Addition to the diet of 5 or 10% rapeseed, which provided 2.1 or 4.2% oil and 0.65 or 1.3% C 22:1 (erucic acid), respectively, increased C 18:2, 18:3, and 22:1 and decreased C 16:0, 18:0, and 18:1 fatty acids in the backfat. C 22:1 reached a maximum of 3.7 weight percent of the total fatty acids. PA had no influence on backfat composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. P. BOWLAND (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: