The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of two-component ceramic primers on the bond strength of a composite material joined to a sintered porcelain material. Two sizes of porcelain discs (VMK 68; 10 and 8 mm in diameter by 2.5 mm thick) were ground (No. 1000 SiC), and surface-conditioned using one of the following systems: (i) unprimed, (ii) Liquid A of the Porcelain Liner M material (PLM-A), (iii) Liquid B of Porcelain Liner M (PLM-B), (iv) Liquids A and B of Porcelain Liner M (PLM-AB), (v) Liquid A of the Tokuso Ceramics Primer material (TCP-A), (vi) Liquid B of Tokuso Ceramics Primer (TCP-B) and (vii) Liquids A and B of Tokuso Ceramics Primer (TCP-AB). All specimens were bonded with the Bistite II dual-cured composite luting agent, and shear bond strengths were determined both after 24 h immersion in water and after subsequent thermocycling (4-60 degrees C, 1 min each, 20,000 cycles). Of the seven groups assessed, two groups (PLM-AB and TCP-AB) showed the greatest bond strength both before (30.7 MPa for PLM-AB and 29.7 MPa for TCP-AB) and after (19.7 MPa for PLM-AB and 22.4 MPa for TCP-AB) thermocycling (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the PLM-AB and TCP-AB groups regardless of the application of thermocycling (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that both of the acid-catalysed two-liquid ceramic primers showed superior bonding to the unhydrolysed single-liquid silane agents (PLM-B and TCP-A) when the feldspathic porcelain was bonded with the Bistite II luting composite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nogami et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: