Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Early diagnosis and treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with better outcomes; however, diagnostic delays remain a major problem. Objective: Describe the prevalence, determinants and consequences of delayed diagnoses. Methods: This single-centre ambispective study analysed 146 adult relapsing-remitting MS patients (2016–2021) for frequency and determinants of diagnostic delays and their associations with clinical, cognitive, imaging and biochemical measures. Results: Diagnostic delays were identified in 77 patients (52.7%), including 42 (28.7%) physician-dependent cases and 35 (24.0%) patient-dependent cases. Diagnosis was delayed in 22 (15.1%) patients because of misdiagnosis by a neurologist. A longer diagnostic delay was associated with trends towards greater Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores ( B = 0.03; p = 0.034) and greater z-score of the blood neurofilament light chain ( B = 0.35; p = 0.031) at the time of diagnosis. Compared with patients diagnosed at their first clinical relapse, patients with a history of >1 relapse at diagnosis ( n = 63; 43.2%) had a trend towards greater EDSS scores ( B = 0.06; p = 0.006) and number of total ( B = 0.13; p = 0.040) and periventricular ( B = 0.06; p = 0.039) brain lesions. Conclusion: Diagnostic delays in MS are common, often determined by early misdiagnosis and associated with greater disease burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uher et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: