The dimensions of the RSI problem (incidence, cost, and affected groups) are described. Psychiatric, medical, and psychological explanations of causation are examined. The psychiatric explanation that RSI is a conversion disorder is not supported in the literature. There is research support for the medical/ergonomic explanation that pain and fatigue result from poor operating posture and, to a lesser extent, from excessive force and repeated movement. However, the existence of a distinct clinical entity apart from accepted disorders (tenosynovitis and the like) is not supported. The association of RSI with psychological factors has received research support and, although a causal relationship cannot yet be assumed, a psychological explanation cannot be discounted. A “best” theory is proposed on the basis of Littlejohn and Miller's 1986 classification of RSI into: (a) well-known clinical entities (Type I); (b) chronic pain syndromes without identifiable degeneration or inflammation (Type II); and (c) chronic pain syndromes in which pain becomes the dominant symptom of a Type I disorder (Type III).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullaly et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: