Why the study?
Does supervised moderate intensity aerobic exercise improve heart rate variability in obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
Does supervised moderate intensity aerobic exercise improve heart rate variability in obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
Six months of moderate intensity aerobic exercise significantly improves cardiac autonomic regulation, as measured by heart rate variability, in obese adults with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports autonomic benefits of aerobic training in obese T2D; leaves open confirmation in RCTs before clinical adoption.
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of moderate aerobic exercise on heart rate variability (HRV) in obese adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Forty-one obese adults with type 2 diabetes participated in this study. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were measured, and resting electrocardiogram (ECG) for the HRV analysis at spontaneous respiration was recorded for 5 min in supine position before and after six months of supervised aerobic training given thrice-a-week. RESULTS: The mean age, body mass index (BMI), and duration of diabetes of the study population were 44.1 ± 4.5 years, 30.94 ± 1.36 kg/m2, and 16.3 ± 2.7 years, respectively. In time domain variables, standard deviation of all RR intervals (SDNN), the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent RR intervals (RMSSD) and percentage of consecutive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms (pNN50) were significantly increased after exercise. In frequency domain variables, high frequency (HF) (ms2) and HF (nu) were significantly increased while low frequency (LF) (ms2) and LF/HF ratio were significantly decreased after exercise. But LF (nu) was unaffected after exercise. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that thrice-a-week moderate intensity aerobic exercise for six months improves cardiac rhythm regulation as measured by HRV in obese adults with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goit et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: