Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Interleukin 18 (IL-18) is primarily a macrophage-derived, pro-inflammatory cytokine. As macrophages can act as effector cells in acute rejection, we examined the role of IL-18 in a rat model of acute renal allograft rejection. METHODS: Life-sustaining orthotopic DA to Lewis allograft and Lewis-Lewis isograft kidney transplants were performed. In the same model, macrophage-depleted animals, achieved with liposomal-clodronate therapy, were also studied. Macrophage (ED1+) accumulation and IL-18 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. CD11b+ cells (macrophages) were isolated from kidney and spleen by micro beads. Real-time PCR was used to assess IL-18 and INF-gamma mRNA expression in tissue and cell isolates. RESULTS: Allografts, but not isografts, developed severe tubulo-interstitial damage and increased serum creatinine by day 5 (P<0.001). Immunohistochemistry revealed a greater ED1+ cell accumulation in day 5 allografts compared with isografts (P<0.001). IL-18 mRNA expression was increased 3-fold in allografts compared to isografts (P<0.001). Accordingly, IL-18 protein was increased in allografts (P<0.001), and was predominantly expressed by ED1+ macrophages. CD11b+ macrophages isolated from allografts had a 6-fold upregulation of IL-18 mRNA expression compared to isograft macrophages (P<0.001). Macrophage depletion resulted in a marked attenuation of allograft rejection, ED1+ and IL-18+ cells were significantly reduced (P<0.05) as was IL-18 mRNA expression (29.28+/-2.85 vs 62.48+/-3.05, P<0.001). INF-gamma mRNA expression (P<0.01) and iNOS (P<0.001) production were also significantly reduced in the macrophage-depleted animals. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that IL-18 is significantly increased during acute rejection and is principally produced by intra-graft macrophages. We hypothesize that IL-18 upregulation may be an important macrophage effector mechanism during the acute rejection process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wyburn et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: