The absorption spectrum and a cyclic voltammogram for poly(3-hexylthiophene) changed upon C 60 doping but those for poly(3-octadecylthiophene) did not. This suggests that C 60 is an effective dopant for poly(3-hexylthiophene) in the ground state but not for poly(3-octadecylthiophene). The threshold of cyclic voltammetry has shifted to a higher potential in C 60 -doped poly(3-hexylthiophene). This is explained by the lowering of the valence band top due to the electron transfer from poly(3-hexylthiophene) to C 60 . The shift depends on alkyl chain length and decreases with alkyl chain length in accordance with the results of photoemission spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morita et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: