Key result
Coronary vasomotor dysfunction is linked to ~86% higher MACE-EA risk, driven by angina emergency visits.
Why the study?
The prognosis of patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease and coronary function test-proven coronary vasomotor dysfunction is less well-known.
Does CFT-proven coronary vasomotor dysfunction increase the risk of MACE-EA in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease compared to normal CFT?
Cohort (n=1,355)
Does CFT-proven coronary vasomotor dysfunction increase the risk of MACE-EA in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease compared to normal CFT?
In patients with ANOCA, the presence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction doubles the long-term risk of MACE and emergency room visits for angina compared to normal coronary function.
Background and aims Comprehensive evaluation by invasive coronary function test (CFT) of patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease is recommended in current guidelines. The prognosis of patients with CFT-proven coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys) is less well-known. Methods Patients that provided consent for the previously published NL-CFT registry who underwent clinically indicated invasive CFT between February 1st, 2019 and June 1st, 2024 were included. Patients with CVDys defined as an abnormal spasm provocation test and/or microvascular functional assessment, were compared to patients with normal CFT. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events and emergency room visits for angina (MACE-EA) was defined as a composite of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, revascularization, repeat angiography without intervention, heart failure hospitalizations and unplanned hospitalizations or emergency room visits due to angina. Results In total, 1355 patients were included. In 79.8%, CFT was abnormal, vasospasm was the most prevalent endotype. In 1252 patients follow-up of clinical events was complete. During a mean follow-up of 33±13 months, CVDys patients had almost double the number of primary outcome events compared to patients with a normal CFT (31.2% vs 16.8%, p<0.001), driven by emergency care visits for angina. Secondary clinical endpoints including death, myocardial infarction, stroke or revascularization were low and comparable between the groups. Conclusions The long-term risk of MACE-EA is doubled in ANOCA patients with CFT-confirmed CVDys compared to normal CFT results. Events are dominated by emergency room visits due to angina, illustrating the high disease burden of CVDys. Their (angina-related) health status is significantly worse at follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crooijmans et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) (n=1,355). Coronary vasomotor dysfunction (CVDys) vs. Normal coronary function test (CFT) was evaluated on MACE-EA (composite of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke/TIA, revascularization, repeat angiography without intervention, heart failure hospitalizations and unplanned hospitalizations or ER visits due to angina) (p=<0.001). Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was associated with a higher rate of MACE-EA compared to normal coronary function testing (31.2% vs 16.8%, p<0.001), driven by emergency care visits for angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: