Factorization of residues of poles of the S matrix is derived from the requirements of unitarity for partialwave helicity amplitudes. Careful attention is given to questions of spin and the kinematic singularities of the relevant amplitudes, especially at $t=0$. Residues β of a pole in the full partial-wave amplitude satisfy factorization in the simple form βba²=βₐₐβbb. In general, β can be written as β=Kγ, where K contains the standard kinematic singularities of the Hara-Wang type, plus threshold behavior, and γ is a reduced residue. The K's for various mass classes are exhibited in a compact and consistent form, and the corresponding factorization statements for the reduced residues are derived. These factorization relations are of the form tˣγba²=γₐₐγbb, where x is an integer. The reduced residues are analytic in the neighborhood of thresholds and pseudothresholds, but may, in the case of conspiracies, contain poles at $t=0$. Various examples are presented to illustrate the use of factorization. These include LeBellac's argument on the behavior of the pion residue at $t=0$ and its circumvention with a type-II conspiracy. mandelstam's treatment of Adler's self-consistency condition and the hypothesis of partially conserved axial-vector current using an $M=1$ pion is discussed from the viewpoint of factorization. It is shown that factorization for an $M=1$ pion seems to imply smallness of both soft-pion and hard-pion amplitudes. The smallness of the latter casts some doubt on the $M=1$ assignment for the pion. The nature of the relations between amplitudes and the behavior of the reduced residues at $t=0$ for conspiracies with unequal masses is also considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbab et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: