The A−B-type silicone copolymer, Me 3 SiO−(Me 2 SiO) 23 −Me 2 SiCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 −O−(CH 2 CH 2 O) 51.6 H (Si 25 C 3 EO 51.6 ), forms only lamellar liquid crystal (L α ) in water over a whole range of concentrations. Rich phase behavior was observed upon addition of conventional nonionic surfactant, C 12 EO 5, whose molecular weight is ∼1/10 of Si 25 C 3 EO 51.6 . For both amphiphiles, f, the volume fraction of hydrophilic part in amphiphile, is the same, and f = 0.5. C 12 EO 5 alone forms aqueous micellar solution (W m ), normal hexagonal (H 1 ), bicontinuous cubic (V 1 ), lamellar (L α ), and reverse micellar solution (O m ) phases in water with increasing surfactant concentration. On the other hand, W m, discontinuous micellar cubic (I 1 ), L α, reverse bicontinuous cubic (V 2 ), and reverse hexagonal (H 2 ) phases are successively formed in water at a 70/30 weight ratio of Si 25 C 3 EO 51.6 /C 12 EO 5 . A reduction in the effective cross-sectional area per amphiphile at hydrophobic surface ( a S ) takes place upon addition of C 12 EO 5 in the mixed system. A small amphiphile, C 12 EO 5, is dissolved in the copolymer L α phase, and a relatively small amount of surfactant occupies a rather large area at an interface of aggregates, although the a S for Si 25 C 3 EO 51.6 in the L α phase is more than double that for C 12 EO 5 . Hence, the surfactant mainly dictates the morphology or amphiphile-layer curvature in the mixed system. The copolymer is practically insoluble in the L α phase of C 12 EO 5 due to the packing constraint. Hence, two L α phases coexist in a surfactant-rich region at W S = 0.75, where W S is the weight fraction of total amphiphile in the system. On the other hand, the copolymer L α phase changes to the I 1 phase with increasing the surfactant mixing fraction at W S = 0.55. The spherical micelle in the I 1 phase has a double-layer structure in which the surface is covered by surfactant and the core is pure poly(dimethylsiloxane) chain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunieda et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: