The molecular structures and relative energies of several of the lowest-energy conformations of [10]annulene (C 1 0 H 1 0 ) have been investigated using the Hartree−Fock (HF) method, density functional theory (DFT), second-order Møller−Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and (for the first time) coupled cluster singles and doubles with a perturbative inclusion of connected triple excitations [CCSD(T)]. For some years the HF method has been known to incorrectly favor bond-length-alternating structures for [10]annulene, and standard forms of DFT are now seen to incorrectly favor aromatic structures. For the naphthalene-like conformation, the B3LYP method is shown to require a large basis set before the geometry becomes properly bond-localized, i.e., similar to the predictions of CCSD(T) using even a modest basis set. With a basis set of 170 functions, B3LYP and BP86 predict that the aromatic heart-shaped conformation is 9.11 and 12.11 kcal mol - 1, respectively, lower than the bond-alternating twist form, while with the same basis set CCSD(T) places the heart-shaped conformation 6.29 kcal mol - 1 above the twist. Further large-scale CCSD(T) computations involving 340 basis functions predict that the twist conformation is lowest in energy, and the naphthalene-like and heart-shaped conformations lie higher than the twist by 1.40 and 4.24 kcal mol - 1, respectively. Implications of the computed structures and energetics for the interpretation of previous experiments are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: