Key result
Facilities affiliated with the Christian Health Association of Malawi had higher odds of providing antenatal blood pressure measurement relative to government facilities (OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.71-6.11).
Why the study?
What service side factors are associated with access to antenatal blood pressure measurement at health facilities in Malawi?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,499)
Yes
What service side factors are associated with access to antenatal blood pressure measurement at health facilities in Malawi?
Significant regional and facility-type variations exist in the provision of antenatal blood pressure measurement in Malawi, highlighting gaps in quality of care.
Equity in antenatal BP access by demographics and provider factors observed in Malawi; leaves open other service barriers for investigation.
Aim: To identify service side factors associated with access to antenatal blood pressure measurement at health facilities in Malawi. Methods: Secondary data analysis of 1499 observations of antenatal consultations undertaken in the Service Provision Assessment survey 2013-14, a census of all formal health facilities in the country. Results: Differentials in access to antenatal blood pressure measurements by client age or educational status and provider gender or in-service training did not reach statistical significance although clinically important effects cannot be excluded. There was substantial variation among districts, ranging from 14% to 100% of observed consultations. Facilities in the Central and Southern regions had lower odds of providing blood pressure measurement relative to the Northern region (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30 and 0.11, 95% 0.04 to 0.31 respectively). Facilities affiliated to the Christian Health Association of Malawi and facilities under private management had higher odds of provision relative to government facilities (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.11 and 5.77, 95% CI 1.87 to 17.79 respectively). Where observed consultations included taking the client's weight and measuring the symphysis-fundus height, the odds of blood pressure measurement were significantly increased (OR 6.4, 95% CI 3.32 to 12.34 and 1.71, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.88 respectively). Conclusion: An indicator for effective coverage, the proportion of antenatal visits that included blood pressure measurement, recorded in health passports examined at the time of admission for delivery, should be tested for incorporation into the District Health Information System to enable tracking of quality improvement in antenatal care. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons for the variations identified here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Stones (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Antenatal care (n=1,499). Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM) affiliation vs. Government management was evaluated on Provision of antenatal blood pressure measurement (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.11). Facilities affiliated with the Christian Health Association of Malawi had higher odds of providing antenatal blood pressure measurement relative to government facilities (OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.71-6.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: