Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dispersion of metallic Cu nanoparticles on a metal oxide support increases the number of exposed metallic Cu sites and/or Cu-support interfacial sites, resulting in good catalytic performance for CO 2 -to-methanol hydrogenation. However, the formation of highly dispersed Cu nanoparticles is challenging because they are easily sintered. Here, we studied Cu nanoparticle formation by a simple deposition–reduction technique using Cu-doped MgAl 2 O 4 (Mg 1– x Cu x Al 2 O 4 ). Mg 1– x Cu x Al 2 O 4 possessed the following three types of Cu 2+ species: short O–Cu octahedrally coordinated [CuO 6 ] s, elongated O–Cu octahedrally coordinated [CuO 6 ] el, and tetrahedrally coordinated [CuO 4 ] t . The former two are found in the inverse-spinel-type Mg 1– x Cu x Al 2 O 4, while the other is found in the normal-spinel-type Mg 1– x Cu x Al 2 O 4 . Additionally, by focusing on the difference in the reducibility of the Cu 2+ species, we clarified that their fraction is related to Cu loading. For low Cu loading ( x < 0.3), Mg 1– x Cu x Al 2 O 4 mainly contained the [CuO 6 ] s species. On the other hand, for high Cu loading ( x ≥ 0.3), the fraction of the [CuO 6 ] el and [CuO 4 ] t species increased. Notably, among the prepared catalysts, H 2 -reduced Mg 0.8 Cu 0.2 Al 2 O 4 ( x = 0.2) had the largest number of exposed metallic Cu sites, resulting in its good catalytic performance. Hence, the H 2 reduction of [CuO 6 ] s is essential for forming metallic Cu nanoparticles on metal oxides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: