Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract d-Fructose 1,6-diphosphatase was extensively purified from swine kidney by a simplified procedure which involved chromatography on cellulose phosphate, ammonium sulfate fractionation, and separation on Sephadex G-200. The final specific activity of the enzyme was 25.2 µmoles per min per mg and 34% of the activity present in the crude extract was recovered. The stability of the purified enzyme was greatly increased by the addition of 0.01 m β-mercaptoethylamine and 0.0005 m 8-hydroxyquinoline. The purified enzyme was sensitive to inhibition by adenosine monophosphate and high concentrations of d-fructose 1,6-diphosphate. The preparation was essentially homogeneous after electrophoresis, ultracentrifugation, and elution from cellulose phosphate and Sephadex G-200 columns. Ultracentrifugal sedimentation analysis revealed the presence of a major symmetrical peak with s20, ω = 7.5 and a minor symmetrical peak with s20, ω = 3.6. The proportion of the minor peak was increased by dialysis of the enzyme preparation. The molecular weight of swine kidney d-fructose 1,6-diphosphatase calculated from data obtained by ultracentrifugation, chromatography on Sephadex G-200, and sucrose density gradient centrifugation was 129,500 and that of the minor component was about 65,000. The turnover number of the enzyme was 3250 moles of d-fructose 1,6-diphosphate converted to fructose 6-phosphate and inorganic phosphate per min per mole of enzyme. Analysis of the amino acid composition indicated the presence of a comparatively large amount of basic amino acids, particularly lysine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendicino et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: